In doing so, we have found that most violations stem from a few common mistakes that can be, for the most part, easily avoided. Revised versions of the gnu lesser general public license. From version 5, we have changed the license from lgpl to polyform noncommercial 1. Can you distribute software under gpl v3 and require users to. Qt licensed under commercial licenses is appropriate for development of. Aug 26, 2008 sflc continues to conduct gpl enforcement and compliance efforts for many of its clients who release their software under the gpl, the gnu lesser public license lgpl and other copyleft licenses. That you distribute the code, and any changes to it, under the terms of the lgpl. Software can become incompatible with secondary licenses in one of two ways.
You must release the source code in its preferred form not minified or obfuscated, including any changes that you make to it. A lesser general public license lgpl is a license for opensource software that allows for provisions for including elements of free software in either free or proprietary software. Why should i use the gnu gpl rather than other free software licenses. Also, theres nothing preventing you from selling an open source app on the microsoft app marketplace. The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a freesoftware license published by the free software foundation fsf. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. Otherwise, the programs maintainer may be the holder, or else could tell you how to contact the holder, so report it to the maintainer. In combination with the polyform noncommercial license we sell licenses for customers who use epplus in a commercial business. Why you shouldnt use the lesser gpl for your next library. Can i use an lgpllicenced library in my commercial app. The gnu lesser general public license lgpl is a free software license published by the free software foundation fsf. Which license is best for a given library is a matter of strategy, and it depends. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. Apr 17, 2010 the agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint.
Feb 05, 2008 these opensource technologies can be found in mainstream commercial software applications developed by a wide range of wellknown companies, like adobe, real networks, mcafee, and many others. What complicates things with regards to gstreamer is its pluginbased design and the heavily patented and proprietary nature of many multimedia codecs. These components are open source software licensed under a license approved. Say, for example, that a small software company determines that part of a. In addition, as a special exception, the holders of name of your program give you permission to combine name of your program with free software programs or libraries that are released under the gnu lgpl and with code included in the standard release of name of library under the name of librarys license or modified versions. It keeps your code bona fide open source, so people who want to use and extend it noncommercially can do so without worrying about you at all. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. The lgpl license allows an application that references the binaries to remain closedsource. Both licenses have the same intention, namely to protect the freedom of users to use and modify the software licensed under lgpl. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. The free software foundation recognizes the wtfpl as a gplcompatible free software license but does not recommend its use. Lgplv3 is the current version of the gnu lesser general public license. Creative commons corporation creative commons is not a law firm and.
Oct 10, 2011 the gnu gpl general public license covers over 50% of the free software projects including the linux kernel, busybox and many applications. You mention that it is licensed under the lgpl, with reference to the full license. Often a company offers the software free but with paid support options. Besides the lgpl license for pyside2, youll have to make sure that you comply with the qt licensing terms. The gnu project has two principal licenses to use for libraries. It does not require the source code of the commercial application to be opened nor does it restrict the licensing. Qt licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl version 3 is. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu project. Describes the ability to use the software for commercial purposes. But it may be used in proprietary applications without these applications becoming free software. Commercial software and open source licensing chris dail. How to license the applications you build with gstreamer.
The version numbers diverged in 1999 when version 2. List of proprietary sourceavailable software wikipedia. The effect of the gpl in the commercial world has been interesting. Under the mpl, the copyleft terms apply to any modifications you make to an mpl file or any file that contains any part of the original mpl code. The gpl licenses gplv3, gplv2, lgpl, affero gpl all contain some kind of sharealike license. This is a lesser form of the gpl that is supposedly commercial friendly. Some companies, such as mysql ab, exist by duallicensing their software. One version is licensed under the gpl, while another is commercially licensedfor a fee, a company can have the restrictions of the gpl removed. Ohhhh, now i get itthis is an attempt to make modify in the agpl mean something different from modify in the gpl itself, such that you can do things that would be considered modifying in the gpl and hence trigger copyleft and claim they dont constitute modifying for purposes of the extra proviso in the agpl and hence wont trigger copyleft, so you can incorporate agpl code into.
Anything statically linked to the library can only be redistributed under lgpl, but applications that use the library. Why you should use a bsd style license for your open source. Sep 03, 2016 gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. This is at least the stated goal of the qt company. The license allows developers and companies to use and integrate a software component released under the lgpl into their own even proprietary software without being required by the terms of a strong copyleft license to release the source code of their own components.
Freelibre open source software floss is commercial software. I understand and accept the reason nvidia does not wish to give away driver code. Most commonly gplv2 or any later version is stated by users of the license, to allow upgrading to gplv3. Gpl is a copyleft license so it requires derivative works to be released under the same license and programs linked with a library released under the gpl must also be released under the gpl.
If a library is released under the gpl not the lgpl, does that mean that any software which uses it has. So for me, a coexistence of open source and closed source software is not a bad thing, when it obeys the rules of the lgpl. This is a list of proprietary sourceavailable software, which has available source code, but is not classified as free software or opensource software. Selection from understanding open source and free software licensing book. Top 10 microsoft public license mspl questions answered. Lgpllicensed libraries can be linked with nongpl licensed programs, including proprietary software.
Some representatives of proprietary software companies leave the mistaken impression that all floss programs are noncommercial. The commercial qt license gives you the full rights to create and distribute software on your own terms without any open source license obligations. Youve already got the answer that lgpl libraries can be used in commercial software. You may copy, distribute and modify the software provided that modifications are described and licensed for free under lgpl. In some cases, this type of software is originally sold and released without the source code, and the source code becomes available later. Aug 15, 2015 mozilla public license mpl the mozilla foundation ls the custodian of the mozilla public ucense mpl. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. But the nature of the gpl is such that any customer purchasing a copy of a gpl product also receives the right to distribute that copy for free or. We all work for companies and need payment or at least food. Users choosing to use cgal under the freeofcharge open source license have to comply to its terms, otherwise they have to buy a commercial license. Jun 21, 2016 it also contains a patent license and retaliation clause which is designed to prevent patents including patent trolls from encumbering the software project.
Stallman devised an alternative to the commercial software license and called it the gpl, or gnu public license. Using gpllicensed components in proprietary projects. The main idea here is that the library remains free software. Many of stallmans coworkers had left to form two companies based on software developed at mit and licensed by mit. Track in fossa gnu lesser general public license v2. With the commercial license you also have access to the official qt support and close strategic relationship with the qt company to make sure your development goals are met. Even modules like the virtual keyboard, the software renderer for qml without opengl and the unittest integration into qtcreator will become available under gpl. The gpl, lgpl, and mozilla licenses understanding open. The mpl has a limited amount of copyleft terms, more than the bsd family of licenses, but fewer than the lpgl or the gpl. The lgpl is intended to be a license for libraries.
You may copy, distribute and modify the software provided that you state modifications and license them under lgpl 2. How can i legally use lgpl javascript in a commercial web. It is not true that gpl is never used inside the companies, many companies have used software libraries under this license and did release all codes that interact with these libraries, as a license required. Qt documentation is available under commercial licenses from the qt company, and. Lesser general public license lgpl definition what does lesser general public license lgpl mean. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it. Mention of lgpl mit source code in a commercial software. May 26, 2014 ive never felt that companies selling gpllicensed software will go very far. Lesser general public license is sometimes referred to as library gpl or gnu libraries, and some associate it with the idea of. All commercial software developers, both proprietary and floss, expect their users to obey the license provided or negotiate something else, as is required by law. Ianal, but it is pretty clear that this license would fall apart if the owner attempted to enforce it.
Can i link a gpl program with a proprietary system library. See how to choose a license for your own work for general recommendations about choosing a license for your work. Effects of licensing on the commercial software world. The above copyleft license didnt work for many software libraries because no one who. The lgpl provides an alternative license that preserves many of the benefits of the gpl model for such librariesin fact, the lesser general public license was in its first incarnation known as the library general public license. The free software foundation may publish revised andor new versions of the gnu lesser general public license from time to time. What is foss licensesapache, bsd, gpl, lgpl explained techcode. Then tell the publisher or holder of the specific gplcovered program.
A company is running a modified version of a program licensed under the gnu. The thing is, pyside2 is for using the qt framework with python programs. Derivatives works including modifications or anything statically linked to the library can only be redistributed under lgpl, but applications that use the library dont have. Aug 28, 2014 the restrictions of including unedited lgpl software in your product are fairly simple and can be somewhat oversimplistically summarized as.
1141 455 690 1154 1512 940 359 27 254 1012 1131 1081 1456 263 1109 1587 1475 1464 812 675 536 618 36 1211 1263 464 437 432 208 1093 25 1362 190 184